As of yesterday, another income tax season has come to a close here in the US. CPA’s who haven’t been home in months can finally return to the family dinner table. And at long last city sidewalks are free from the invasion of creepy sign-spinning Statues of Liberty beckoning to us from the side of the road.
No matter how we feel about the way our taxes are collected and spent and whether some of us should be paying more or some of us less, I’m guessing none of us particularly enjoys the income tax process. The laws are complicated, and growing more so all the time. The effort expended in calculating it all expands from year to year at an unbelievably stupid rate.
But as Benjamin Franklin famously said, “…in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except for death and taxes.” It’s something we have to deal with. Failure to file will net us fines and legal battles. So any readers out there who are law-abiding US taxpayers, I want to offer a hearty congratulations for successfully slugging through another year and getting it done. You may be tired. A few of you may have even been up past your bedtime so you could sneak in just before the deadline. If so, rub your blurry eyes, grab a cup of coffee, draw a deep breath, and realize it could be worse.
Because in 1798, for Englishman John Collins, it was much worse. Collins was busy at work with a printing plate, producing linen hat labels for anxious customers when he learned just how serious the business of taxation could be. The plate was readied, the linen damp and awaiting its impression, and Collins’s hand was covered in ink. That’s when he was arrested for forgery.
What he had been trying to pull off was a sneak around England’s tax on men’s hats. Introduced by Parliament in 1784, it was designed to be a kind of income tax because in theory, the wealthy would own several expensive hats, while the poor may own one cheap hat, if any at all.
To sell hats required a license that cost two pounds in London (or five shillings in the countryside) and gave the seller the right to post a sign reading: “Dealer in Hats by Retail.” A hat costing up to four shillings carried a tax bill of three pence and as the cost of the hat increased, so did the tax, with hats greater than twelve shillings demanding a hefty 2-shilling tax. Penalties for hats without a tax labels affixed to the linings fell both to the seller and the wearer.
The hat tax was perhaps better than the window tax, the disastrous effects of which can still be seen in the large number of bricked-up windows gracing English buildings, but it turns out Englishmen were almost as fond of the hat tax as the citizens of the former British colonies in America had been of the English tea tax just a few years earlier. Removal and reuse of stamps was common and punishable. In the early days of the law, retailers attempted to change the language they used to refer to their wares, causing revisions that broadened the definition of a hat. Still the unpopular hat tax was widely ignored, hard to enforce, and was finally repealed in 1811.
Unfortunately that came after John Collins was caught forging tax labels. He got more than a fine or a legal battle. To forge a hat tax label in England in 1798 was a capital crime. Poor John Collins learned that there were certainties he couldn’t escape when he evaded taxes and met with death.
6 thoughts on “The Certainty of Death and Taxes”
I’m reminded that when Americans promised to evade taxes, and said they’d fight the government over the issue, George Washington grabbed a dozen nooses, and about 14,000 tax-paying law-abiders, and marched to western Pennsylvania for discussions, and action.
When Washington’s Tax Enforcing Army arrived, oddly, they found no one willing to wear a noose.
Don’t you just love history?
(Details of story here: https://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/taxes-are-stolen-those-who-dont-know-history-shouldnt-pretend-to-complain-about-taxes/ )
I love that srory! Thanks for the link!
Do you moderate all comments, or just those with links?
I do moderate all comments. Given the nature of my blog I probably don’t really need to because it tends to attract a pretty respectful bunch and I generally avoid controversy anyway. Still, I want to maintain a positive tone, even when disagreements occasionally pop up. I never edit opinions, but if someone drops a swear word, I will “bleep” it.
This was a delightful post. I guess in the long run the hat tax wasn’t so much done away with as disguised by taxing EVERYTHING!
There’s probably some truth to that. It’s amazing some of the crazy ways governments have collected taxes from their people through the years. Around the same time, England also taxed wig powder. So, I guess the people had stinky wigs and no hats.