In August of 1926, The Yale Review published a little sci-fi story that I suspect had much further-reaching consequences than the editors imagined it would. But some astute readers were paying attention and quietly began spreading the highly instructive message of “The Tissue-Culture King” by Julian Huxley.
Huxley tells the tale of a group of scientifically minded explorers that, lost in the African bush, follows a two-headed toad and stumbles into a giant engaged in worshipping a microscope slide. The party soon becomes acquainted with a previously unknown kingdom with a highly developed culture of blood and ancestor worship.
Also in the kingdom is another white man who had been captured fifteen years earlier and, with the aid of the King’s most important advisor, had managed to exploit the people’s religious rites for the purpose of scientific experimentation, thus giving rise to the worship of tissue cultures as the means to immortality for the king and beloved elders.
I admit that so far, the story sounds a little far-fetched, but I think it’s safe to say that’s just what They want us to think. Late in the story, just about the time this reader’s eyes want to glaze over, another type of ongoing research is introduced. The captured scientist reveals that, with the enthusiastic support of the King’s man, he has been experimenting with hypnosis and telepathy.
Excited at the possibilities of the experiments, the narrator begins to assist and soon the two are able, with group hypnotic suggestion, to send instructions in a wave over the entire kingdom. At this point the narrator thinks they might use their newfound scientific powers to put the kingdom to sleep and make their escape, if only they can find a way to shield themselves from the hypnotic suggestion.
To us modern readers, the answer is clear. The captives shield themselves from the telepathic waves by donning hats made of metal foil. It works, at least until they assume they are far enough away to abandon their protective headgear, only to discover that the King’s evil henchman has overcome and amended their suggestion to a simple, irresistible command to return.
Experts on tin foil hats, who are extremely difficult to find and are rarely willing to make public comments, suggest that Huxley’s fairly obscure story is the smoking gun in the truth about where the foil hat phenomenon came from in the first place. Of course, they also admit that could be a lie fed to us by the government. The world may never know.
What we do know, thanks to the incredibly important work of some MIT grad students who allegedly have too much time on their hands, is that there may be more to the story. In 2005, the students released the results of a groundbreaking and mind-shattering study which revealed that aluminum foil hats actually amplify the radio frequency bands allocated for use by the US government.
It’s worth noting that the MIT researchers did not receive so much as a whiff of interest from the Nobel Prize committee. And I suspect we all know why that might be.
This leaves us, I think, with some questions. First, if Julian Huxley’s story really is the first mention of the protective nature of tin foil hats, then how did that idea first occur to him? Could it have been fed to him telepathically by a government intent on amplifying the private thoughts of its citizens? Was Huxley, instead, involved in the elaborate plan? Was the editorial staff of The Yale Review complicit? Is the MIT study merely an attempt at misdirection by the Feds?
Or did Julian Huxley never intend for any of his readers to actually wear tin foil hats? And was the point of “The Tissue-Culture King” exactly as stated in the story itself, that the increase of scientific knowledge and the power it may lend to those who would yield it for their personal gain, might carry with it some consequences well worth considering? Eh, that seems a little far-fetched.
13 thoughts on “It’s A Big Conspiracy”
Hats off to you, Sarah. We live in a complicated world!
Oh, no! Don’t take your hat off! Or do. Yes, it is a complicated world.
You find the best stuff to write about! How very interesting! 🙂
I use all that time I should be writing books to surf the internet instead. 🙂
Amen to that haha I do the same thing
Wow! I mean, er, um, the government would never use science to its own advantage. We all know the government is only filled with good, honest people looking out for the interests of the citizenry and not their own selfish interests.
I see no reason why our government would ever be anything but completely honest and transparent about everything, as I will always say in a public, traceable forum such as this.
The amplify thing discovered by MIT stands to reason: to protect against electromagnetic frequencies you need to have a closed space – a principle discovered by Michael Faraday in 1836 and built into every common or garden microwave these days. Because the hats aren’t, they act as aerials instead (aluminium being a great conductor). It’s kind of apposite: here in NZ protestors recently occupied Parliament grounds and began wearing tinfoil hats to ‘protect’ themselves from the – er – ‘rays’ being supposedly broadcast at them by the government. In reality, of course, the only thing being directed at them by government was an on-repeat recording of Barry Manilow via a set of loudspeakers, part of an effort by the Speaker of the House (my former MP as it happens) to drive them off with annoying music. It didn’t work, but of course he hadn’t discovered Swedish Death Metal.
I don’t think government authorities here have tried the Barry Manilow technique to break up protests. Maybe that’s just considered too lethal. 😉
I do not believe any of the science behind the tinfoil hats. I only wear mine because I think I look good in it.
It’s a bold style choice. Not everyone can pull it off
Apparently I cannot pull it off.